Discursive positioning of beginning teachers’ professional learning during induction: a critical literature review from 2004 to 2014

Geraldine Mooney Simmie, Cathal de Paor, Jennifer Liston, John O’Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study reports on findings from a critical literature review, from 2004 to 2014, in relation to the positioning of beginning teachers’ professional learning during induction. The study uses theoretical frameworks drawn from competing discourses: an instrumental standpoint based on performativity and a dialectical standpoint based on a transformative view of good teaching as an advanced specialised practice. A critical analysis was conducted, using a systematic literature review that yielded 14 peer-reviewed papers, to discursively position teachers’ professional learning and pinpoint questions for future study. Findings showed that while studies reported positive outcomes they were often atheoretical and framed within narrow chains of logic that neglected important strands, such as, teacher “knowledge-of-practice”. The study raises important questions not only about the positioning of beginning teachers’ professional learning but about meaningful professional learning for all teachers across the continuum of teacher education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-519
Number of pages15
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • critical analysis
  • Induction
  • literature review
  • teacher professional learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive positioning of beginning teachers’ professional learning during induction: a critical literature review from 2004 to 2014'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this