Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking interventions on CVD risk factors: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials among inactive healthy adults

  • Pekka Oja
  • , Paul Kelly
  • , Elaine M. Murtagh
  • , Marie H. Murphy
  • , Charlie Foster
  • , Sylvia Titze
  • UKK Institute
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Mary Immaculate College
  • Ulster University
  • University of Bristol
  • University of Graz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Walking interventions in healthy populations show clinically relevant improvements for many cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. We aimed to assess the changes in CVD risk factors and the dose-response relationship between frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking and cardiovascular risk factors based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Data sources Four electronic databases searched from January 1971 to April 2017. Eligibility criteria Walking RCTs reporting one or more CVD risk factor outcomes; trials including at least one group with walking intervention and a no-walking control group; duration =8 weeks; participants =18 years old, inactive but healthy; risk factors assessed preintervention and postintervention; English-language articles in peer-reviewed journals. results Thirty-seven RCTs, involving 2001 participants (81% women) and assessing 13 CVD risk factors, were identifed. Pooled meta-analysis showed favourable effects (P≥0.05) of walking intervention for seven CVD risk factors (body mass, body mass index, body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose and VO 2max). There were no signifcant effects (P>0.05) for waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and four blood lipid variables. Despite testing 91 possible dose-response relationships, linear meta-regression analysis adjusted for age indicated just 7 (or 7.7%) statistically signifcant fndings. summary/conclusion Walking interventions beneft a number of CVD risk factors. Despite multiple studies and tested metrics, only a few dose-response relationships were identifed and the possibility of chance fndings cannot be ruled out. There is insuffcient evidence to quantify the frequency, length, bout duration, intensity and volume of the walking required to improve CVD risk factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-775
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume52
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking interventions on CVD risk factors: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials among inactive healthy adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this