TY - JOUR
T1 - Electronic Engineering Labs during Pandemic Restrictions – What Ireland did next
AU - Johnson, Michael
AU - Goos, Merrilyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper investigates the shift in experiential education laboratories for electronic, electrical, and computer engineering courses in Ireland, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic forced higher education institutions to adapt their electronic laboratory sessions to a remote delivery model. This study categorizes and evaluates the different approaches taken by Irish higher education institutes (HEIs) to implement remote engineering laboratories. Using survey data, user feedback, and firsthand reports from 33 participants across 12 HEIs, the paper examines the effectiveness of these remote lab methods. The analysis identified five distinct remote laboratory delivery methods, with learning simulations and remote hardware lab kits being the most commonly employed. Although remote hardware lab kits were favored for their perceived effectiveness in replicating hands-on experiences, they posed significant challenges, including increased administrative workload, preparation, implementation, and management overheads. In contrast, simulated lab solutions, though less resource-intensive, did not fully capture the hands-on learning experience. This study highlights the complex challenges faced by Irish HEIs in maintaining effective experiential education in electronic engineering labs during the pandemic, shedding light on the advantages and limitations of remote delivery models and their implications for future educational practices in engineering disciplines.
AB - This paper investigates the shift in experiential education laboratories for electronic, electrical, and computer engineering courses in Ireland, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic forced higher education institutions to adapt their electronic laboratory sessions to a remote delivery model. This study categorizes and evaluates the different approaches taken by Irish higher education institutes (HEIs) to implement remote engineering laboratories. Using survey data, user feedback, and firsthand reports from 33 participants across 12 HEIs, the paper examines the effectiveness of these remote lab methods. The analysis identified five distinct remote laboratory delivery methods, with learning simulations and remote hardware lab kits being the most commonly employed. Although remote hardware lab kits were favored for their perceived effectiveness in replicating hands-on experiences, they posed significant challenges, including increased administrative workload, preparation, implementation, and management overheads. In contrast, simulated lab solutions, though less resource-intensive, did not fully capture the hands-on learning experience. This study highlights the complex challenges faced by Irish HEIs in maintaining effective experiential education in electronic engineering labs during the pandemic, shedding light on the advantages and limitations of remote delivery models and their implications for future educational practices in engineering disciplines.
KW - Electronics & Computer Engineering
KW - Engineering Education
KW - Laboratory
KW - Remote Teaching
KW - Teaching
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019315018
U2 - 10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.921
DO - 10.18687/LACCEI2025.1.1.921
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:105019315018
SN - 2414-6390
JO - Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering, Education and Technology
JF - Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering, Education and Technology
IS - 2025
T2 - 23rd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, LACCEI 2025
Y2 - 16 July 2025 through 18 July 2025
ER -