Abstract
This article analyses the impact of information and consultation regulations – specifically the European Information and Consultation Directive – on worker participation or “employee voice” in liberal market economies (LMEs), providing both empirical and theoretical insights to complement existing research on the Directive. Using game theory and the prisoner's dilemma framework, and empirical data from 16 case studies, the authors explain why national legislation implementing the Directive is largely ineffective in diffusing mutual-gains cooperation in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Three theoretical explanatory propositions advance understanding of the policy impact of information and consultation regulations in LMEs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 395-422 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | International Labour Review |
| Volume | 156 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ireland
- UK
- case study
- labour relations
- market economy
- regulation
- workers participation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Employment regulation, game theory and weak employee voice in liberal economies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver