TY - JOUR
T1 - Engineering students’ perceptions of problem and project-based learning (PBL)
T2 - comparing online and traditional face-to-face environments
AU - O’Connor, Sean
AU - Power, Jason
AU - Blom, Nicolaas
AU - Tanner, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper investigates and compares students’ perceptions of a problem and project-based learning (PBL) module delivered through face-to-face and online environments in sequential years. The study employs a multi-method design, using multiple scales and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected after the completion of the same PBL project in a face-to-face (n = 89) and online (n = 94) environment. The qualitative findings uncover four themes and seven sub-themes affecting engineering students’ perceptions of PBL in a traditional face-to-face environment. Comparing these themes to those from the earlier study on the online environment reveals several unique themes specific to the online setting. The quantitative findings show that students’ overall level of teamwork satisfaction and collaborative attitude show no significant variation across environments. To conclude, the authors outlined three contributions. The first contribution centres on identifying predictive factors affecting students’ perceptions of face-to-face and online PBL environments. The second contribution centres on examining the difference in student teamwork satisfaction and collaborative attitude within the two different environments. The final contribution centres on the unique comparison of engineering PBL presented within this study. The findings underscore the necessity for educators to consider modality-specific factors when designing and implementing PBL in engineering education.
AB - This paper investigates and compares students’ perceptions of a problem and project-based learning (PBL) module delivered through face-to-face and online environments in sequential years. The study employs a multi-method design, using multiple scales and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected after the completion of the same PBL project in a face-to-face (n = 89) and online (n = 94) environment. The qualitative findings uncover four themes and seven sub-themes affecting engineering students’ perceptions of PBL in a traditional face-to-face environment. Comparing these themes to those from the earlier study on the online environment reveals several unique themes specific to the online setting. The quantitative findings show that students’ overall level of teamwork satisfaction and collaborative attitude show no significant variation across environments. To conclude, the authors outlined three contributions. The first contribution centres on identifying predictive factors affecting students’ perceptions of face-to-face and online PBL environments. The second contribution centres on examining the difference in student teamwork satisfaction and collaborative attitude within the two different environments. The final contribution centres on the unique comparison of engineering PBL presented within this study. The findings underscore the necessity for educators to consider modality-specific factors when designing and implementing PBL in engineering education.
KW - Engineering education
KW - online learning
KW - PBL
KW - student attitude
KW - student satisfaction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003182346
U2 - 10.1080/22054952.2025.2493419
DO - 10.1080/22054952.2025.2493419
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003182346
SN - 2205-4952
VL - 30
SP - 138
EP - 162
JO - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education
JF - Australasian Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 2
ER -