TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing stakeholder priorities for advancing the role of the intermediary in the justice system
T2 - Findings from a consensus study
AU - Gallagher, Aoife Lily
AU - Cusack, Alan
AU - Kearns, Áine
AU - O’Mahony, Brendan M.
AU - Taggart, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - At the forefront of efforts to enhance effective communication between vulnerable persons and stakeholders within the legal system has been the introduction of the intermediary. Embedding the role of the intermediary has presented complex challenges across jurisdictions. We report on phase one of a study involving a purposive sample (n = 60) of diverse stakeholders across the Island of Ireland in which priorities for policy, research and practice were generated using a modified nominal group technique. We identified six priority areas: (i) formalising the role; (ii) building awareness and understanding; (iii) establishing mechanisms of professional development and support; (iv) undertaking service evaluation and research; (v) supporting cross-sectoral working; and (vi) ensuring equality of access to intermediaries. In the next phase of the study, priorities of individuals who have experience of using intermediary accommodations will be identified. Findings from both studies will be integrated to provide robust recommendations for policy makers to further advance the role of the intermediary in the justice system.
AB - At the forefront of efforts to enhance effective communication between vulnerable persons and stakeholders within the legal system has been the introduction of the intermediary. Embedding the role of the intermediary has presented complex challenges across jurisdictions. We report on phase one of a study involving a purposive sample (n = 60) of diverse stakeholders across the Island of Ireland in which priorities for policy, research and practice were generated using a modified nominal group technique. We identified six priority areas: (i) formalising the role; (ii) building awareness and understanding; (iii) establishing mechanisms of professional development and support; (iv) undertaking service evaluation and research; (v) supporting cross-sectoral working; and (vi) ensuring equality of access to intermediaries. In the next phase of the study, priorities of individuals who have experience of using intermediary accommodations will be identified. Findings from both studies will be integrated to provide robust recommendations for policy makers to further advance the role of the intermediary in the justice system.
KW - criminal justice system
KW - intermediary
KW - nominal group technique
KW - special measures
KW - speech, language and communication needs
KW - stakeholder engagement
KW - vulnerable witness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213543505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/13657127241306173
DO - 10.1177/13657127241306173
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213543505
SN - 1365-7127
JO - International Journal of Evidence and Proof
JF - International Journal of Evidence and Proof
ER -