Estimated weight of paediatric patients versus measured weight – a prospective comparison

C. Lineen, S. O’Donnell, K. Birrane, A. O’Riordan, J. Twomey, A. M. Murphy, C. O’Gorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Weight measurement is fundamental in the management of paediatric patients. Many methods have been described for estimating a patient’s weight. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the APLS 2017 estimated weight guidelines. Methods 100 patient charts were analysed in University Hospital Limerick’s Paediatric unit. Measured weights were recorded, and estimated weights were calculated using the APLS 2017 charts. Estimated and measured weight was compared using Bland Altman plots. Results Of 100 subjects, 53 (53%) were female and 47 (47%) male. Fifty subjects (50%) were Pre-School, 32 (32%) Primary School and 18 (18%) Secondary School. Estimated weight was a good predictor for measured weight, however weight was underestimated by between 2.34% and 16.39% of measured weight. Discussion The current APLS guidelines are reasonably accurate; but accuracy decreases with increasing age. Estimation cannot replace an accurate measurement, which is not always feasible in the acute setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)910
Number of pages1
JournalIrish Medical Journal
Volume112
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimated weight of paediatric patients versus measured weight – a prospective comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this