Abstract
Supranational and cross-national research funding structures bring to the fore the differential importance of national location and gender in such decision-making fora. It shows how gender bias persists in an institutional context supportive of gender equality. The data is drawn from a case study of research funding (€3 million), in a Swedish led, Nordic research consortium. Using documentary research, questionnaires and interviews, it shows that although 45 per cent of all research applications and roughly 40 per cent of those assessed as excellent were led by women, only 22 per cent were funded. Two critical intervention points are identified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 627-643 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Policy and Politics |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Case study
- Gender inequality
- Lack of diversity
- Research funding
- Sweden
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'European policies and research funding: A case study of gender inequality and lack of diversity in a Nordic research programme'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver