TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of insect residue resistant coatings - Correlation of a screening method with a conventional assessment technique
AU - Kok, Mariana
AU - Young, Trevor M.
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Laminar flow technologies such as laminar flow control (LFC) and hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) are drag reduction techniques that allow the stabilization of the boundary layer and therefore permit an extended region of laminar flow to be achieved. The laminar flow region is, however, easily disturbed by surface contamination caused by insect debris, ice or dust particles. This causes a transition of the flow, and results in a turbulent boundary layer. Mitigation of surface contamination through the use of low surface energy coatings is thus of great interest. In this paper, the use of a screening method (utilizing a wet abrasion scrub test) to determine the effectiveness of candidate coatings against insect contamination has been employed. The method was compared to a conventional assessment technique, namely an insect delivery device. It was demonstrated that both approaches have merit; both methods provide useful means of directly quantifying the adhesion of insect debris to aircraft wing surfaces. An analogue, which can be used as a substitute to live insect testing, was also evaluated. The effect of humidity and water on the adhesive properties of insect haemolymph has been investigated.
AB - Laminar flow technologies such as laminar flow control (LFC) and hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) are drag reduction techniques that allow the stabilization of the boundary layer and therefore permit an extended region of laminar flow to be achieved. The laminar flow region is, however, easily disturbed by surface contamination caused by insect debris, ice or dust particles. This causes a transition of the flow, and results in a turbulent boundary layer. Mitigation of surface contamination through the use of low surface energy coatings is thus of great interest. In this paper, the use of a screening method (utilizing a wet abrasion scrub test) to determine the effectiveness of candidate coatings against insect contamination has been employed. The method was compared to a conventional assessment technique, namely an insect delivery device. It was demonstrated that both approaches have merit; both methods provide useful means of directly quantifying the adhesion of insect debris to aircraft wing surfaces. An analogue, which can be used as a substitute to live insect testing, was also evaluated. The effect of humidity and water on the adhesive properties of insect haemolymph has been investigated.
KW - Coating evaluation
KW - Easy-to-clean surfaces
KW - Insect residue adhesion
KW - Test equipment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903193882&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.020
DO - 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84903193882
SN - 0300-9440
VL - 77
SP - 1382
EP - 1390
JO - Progress in Organic Coatings
JF - Progress in Organic Coatings
IS - 9
ER -