Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation of the usability of and engagement with an osteoarthritis e-learning program developed for healthcare professionals

  • Bimbi Gray
  • , Sarah Kobayashi
  • , Jocelyn L. Bowden
  • , Rana S. Hinman
  • , Kim Bennell
  • , Annette Burgess
  • , Andrew M. Briggs
  • , Vicky Duong
  • , Christian Barton
  • , Helen French
  • , Joice Cunningham
  • , Helen Slater
  • , Daniel O'Brien
  • , Jennifer Persaud
  • , Nicolas Gallardo
  • , Kelli Allen
  • , David F. Hamilton
  • , Melanie A. Holden
  • , Katie F. Huffman
  • , Kathryn A. Miller
  • Jonathan Quicke, Søren T. Skou, Bryan Y. Tan, Clodagh Toomey, Martin van der Esch, David J. Hunter, Jillian Eyles
  • Kolling Instiitute of Medical Research
  • Southern Cross University
  • The University of Melbourne
  • University of Sydney
  • Curtin University
  • La Trobe University
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • Auckland University of Technology
  • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Western Australia
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
  • Bethanie Aged Care Facilities
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Keele University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Queensland
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Central and West Zealand Hospital
  • Woodlands Health
  • Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe the development and evaluation of an OA eLearning program for healthcare professionals. The evaluation objectives were to measure the usability of, and engagement with, this program and assess the perceived feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and user satisfaction among OA healthcare professionals. Methods: A feasibility study was conducted, involving registered healthcare professionals, who regularly manage people with OA. Following baseline questionnaires, participants were asked to complete at least four OA eLearning modules over 10 weeks, followed by a 23-item evaluation questionnaire. The primary outcomes were usability and engagement with the OA eLearning program. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and satisfaction. Results: The 31 eligible participants reflected a broad range of professional experiences, nationalities and settings. Program usability, engagement with content, navigation, presentation and overall satisfaction were rated as either very good or good by at least 84% of participants. Participants considered the program to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate, with some areas for improvement in navigating the program. Conclusions: The OA eLearning program shows promise in supporting healthcare professionals to deliver evidence-based care. While the findings from this study will inform a randomised trial, the OA eLearning program is well positioned to enhance clinical education and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100787
JournalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Best-evidence care
  • eLearning
  • Guideline-concordant care
  • Health professional education
  • Osteoarthritis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the usability of and engagement with an osteoarthritis e-learning program developed for healthcare professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this