TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring athlete pain assessment experiences and priorities; a two-part qualitative series of athlete and physiotherapist interactions. Part Two. “Forging our future” - Athlete and physiotherapists' priorities for pain assessment and beyond
AU - Purcell, Ciarán
AU - Walsh, Caoimhe Barry
AU - Van Oirschot, Garett
AU - Fullen, Brona M.
AU - Ward, Tomás
AU - Caulfield, Brian M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objectives: To explore the priorities and directions of athlete upper and lower limb pain assessment by facilitating shared understandings of athletes and sport physiotherapists. Design: Qualitative research using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Methods: We carried out focus groups comprising a deliberate criterion sample using a constructivist perspective. At the end of each focus group, we used the nominal group technique method to generate a list of consensus-based priorities for future pain assessment. Our paper follows the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines. Results: We completed five focus groups, comprising twelve athletes (female, n = 5, male, n = 7) and four sport physiotherapists (male, n = 4). Two final themes (and six subthemes) were developed; I Enhanced Communication and Pain Descriptions (describing and representing pain, better communication, the role of technology, providing direction and setting the pace), and II Integrating Sport Specific and Multidimensional Assessments (broadening the pain assessment toolkit, the role of technology). We developed a set of thirteen practical priorities for pain assessment that span the subjective, objective, and general aspects of the athlete pain assessment. Conclusions: We have presented stakeholder-generated perspectives, direction and priorities for athlete pain assessment. Athletes and physiotherapists must continue to work together to achieve a comprehensive sport-specific multidimensional pain assessment experience alongside their wider support networks to ensure optimal representation and communication. We have highlighted some available pain assessment tools and strategies and outlined how novel tools may address certain gaps. Researchers, clinicians, and athletes can consider the practical guidance we have provided to address these priorities.
AB - Objectives: To explore the priorities and directions of athlete upper and lower limb pain assessment by facilitating shared understandings of athletes and sport physiotherapists. Design: Qualitative research using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Methods: We carried out focus groups comprising a deliberate criterion sample using a constructivist perspective. At the end of each focus group, we used the nominal group technique method to generate a list of consensus-based priorities for future pain assessment. Our paper follows the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines. Results: We completed five focus groups, comprising twelve athletes (female, n = 5, male, n = 7) and four sport physiotherapists (male, n = 4). Two final themes (and six subthemes) were developed; I Enhanced Communication and Pain Descriptions (describing and representing pain, better communication, the role of technology, providing direction and setting the pace), and II Integrating Sport Specific and Multidimensional Assessments (broadening the pain assessment toolkit, the role of technology). We developed a set of thirteen practical priorities for pain assessment that span the subjective, objective, and general aspects of the athlete pain assessment. Conclusions: We have presented stakeholder-generated perspectives, direction and priorities for athlete pain assessment. Athletes and physiotherapists must continue to work together to achieve a comprehensive sport-specific multidimensional pain assessment experience alongside their wider support networks to ensure optimal representation and communication. We have highlighted some available pain assessment tools and strategies and outlined how novel tools may address certain gaps. Researchers, clinicians, and athletes can consider the practical guidance we have provided to address these priorities.
KW - Athletic injuries
KW - Athletic performance
KW - Focus groups
KW - Musculoskeletal pain
KW - Pain management
KW - Pain measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207749034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2024.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2024.10.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207749034
SN - 1440-2440
JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
ER -