Extending digital literacies: Proposing an agentive literacy to tackle the problems of distractive technologies in language learning

Liam Murray, Marta Giralt, Silvia Benini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In a poll (ReImagineEdu, 2016) looking at the digital profile of nearly 1,000 learners, it was reported that 78% of students worry about digital technologies distracting them from study. In attempting to contribute to this emerging debate (Aaron & Lipton, 2018), this article investigates the experiences, perceptions and awareness of undergraduate language learners (n = 215, over a 3-year period) of the distractive nature of technology and the discerned impact upon their own student language learning and performance. The study is based on data gathered from university language students engaged in a specific language technology module. The module, inter alia, sought to develop awareness of the time spent online by participants while using a number of resources. A mixed-methods approach was employed to conduct this research where qualitative and quantitative data emerged respectively from individual student blogs, reflective reports of their blogging experiences, group interviews and questionnaires. Our outcomes reveal a severe lack of student awareness on the final amount of time they spent online, this being due to a number of factors. However, there is some awareness and perception on their part of how heavily disruptive technology can be for their language learning. Our final conclusions include several recommendations and propose a deictic critical digital literacy for dealing with such distractions - we are calling this a strategic agentive literacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-271
Number of pages22
JournalReCALL
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Agentive literacy
  • Critical digital literacies
  • Student distraction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extending digital literacies: Proposing an agentive literacy to tackle the problems of distractive technologies in language learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this