TY - JOUR
T1 - Features of subsyndromal and persistent delirium
AU - Meagher, David
AU - Adamis, Dimitrios
AU - Trzepacz, Paula
AU - Leonard, Maeve
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Background: Longitudinal studies of delirium phenomenology are lacking. Aims: We studied features that characterise subsyndromal delirium and persistent delirium over time. Method: Twice-weekly evaluations of 100 adults with DSM-IV delirium using the Delirium Rating Scale - Revised-98 (DRS-R98) and Cognitive Test for Delirium (CTD). The generalised estimating equation method identified symptom patterns distinguishing full syndromal from subsyndromal delirium and resolving from persistent delirium. Results: Participants (mean age 70.2 years (s.d. = 10.5)) underwent 323 assessments (range 2-9). Full syndromal delirium was significantly more severe than subsyndromal delirium for DRS-R98 thought process abnormalities, delusions, hallucinations, agitation, retardation, orientation, attention, and short- and long-term memory items, and CTD attention, vigilance, orientation and memory. Persistent full syndromal delirium had greater disturbance of DRS-R98 thought process abnormalities, delusions, agitation, orientation, attention, and short- and long-term memory items, and CTD attention, vigilance and orientation. Conclusions: Full syndromal delirium differs from subsyndromal delirium over time by greater severity of many cognitive and noncognitive symptoms. Persistent delirium involves increasing prominence of recognised core diagnostic features and cognitive impairment. Declaration of interest: P.T. is a full-time salaried employee and shareholder at Eli Lilly and Company.
AB - Background: Longitudinal studies of delirium phenomenology are lacking. Aims: We studied features that characterise subsyndromal delirium and persistent delirium over time. Method: Twice-weekly evaluations of 100 adults with DSM-IV delirium using the Delirium Rating Scale - Revised-98 (DRS-R98) and Cognitive Test for Delirium (CTD). The generalised estimating equation method identified symptom patterns distinguishing full syndromal from subsyndromal delirium and resolving from persistent delirium. Results: Participants (mean age 70.2 years (s.d. = 10.5)) underwent 323 assessments (range 2-9). Full syndromal delirium was significantly more severe than subsyndromal delirium for DRS-R98 thought process abnormalities, delusions, hallucinations, agitation, retardation, orientation, attention, and short- and long-term memory items, and CTD attention, vigilance, orientation and memory. Persistent full syndromal delirium had greater disturbance of DRS-R98 thought process abnormalities, delusions, agitation, orientation, attention, and short- and long-term memory items, and CTD attention, vigilance and orientation. Conclusions: Full syndromal delirium differs from subsyndromal delirium over time by greater severity of many cognitive and noncognitive symptoms. Persistent delirium involves increasing prominence of recognised core diagnostic features and cognitive impairment. Declaration of interest: P.T. is a full-time salaried employee and shareholder at Eli Lilly and Company.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855560181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095273
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095273
M3 - Article
C2 - 22075650
AN - SCOPUS:84855560181
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 200
SP - 37
EP - 44
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 1
ER -