TY - JOUR
T1 - Forced to Live
T2 - Controlled Forced Feeding of Political Prisoners and the Challenge to Nation-States’ Civilising Processes
AU - Vertigans, Stephen
AU - Connolly, John
AU - Dolan, Paddy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Since the nineteenth century, struggles between state power and political prisoners' right to die have aroused considerable interest. State enforcement to ‘make live’ through force-feeding also raises important questions concerning processes that inform government approaches, often through methods considered to be brutal, and how these actions fit within perceptions of civilised behaviour. The social scientific focus of hunger strikes tends to be informed by Foucauldian bio-power and governmentality which we draw upon when applying insights from figurational sociology. These insights allow us to better capture shifting social processes and changing public attitudes and behaviours that weaken state control over life and death. Different empirical examples are drawn upon, namely prison based forced feeding programmes that are directed at international ‘Islamicists’, Irish republicans and British suffragettes. Comparing groups' levels of integration within controlling states' societies, highlight distinctions in power balances, layers of mutual identification and entwined public perceptions and state reactions that help explain the implementation, cessation or continuation of force-feeding.
AB - Since the nineteenth century, struggles between state power and political prisoners' right to die have aroused considerable interest. State enforcement to ‘make live’ through force-feeding also raises important questions concerning processes that inform government approaches, often through methods considered to be brutal, and how these actions fit within perceptions of civilised behaviour. The social scientific focus of hunger strikes tends to be informed by Foucauldian bio-power and governmentality which we draw upon when applying insights from figurational sociology. These insights allow us to better capture shifting social processes and changing public attitudes and behaviours that weaken state control over life and death. Different empirical examples are drawn upon, namely prison based forced feeding programmes that are directed at international ‘Islamicists’, Irish republicans and British suffragettes. Comparing groups' levels of integration within controlling states' societies, highlight distinctions in power balances, layers of mutual identification and entwined public perceptions and state reactions that help explain the implementation, cessation or continuation of force-feeding.
KW - barbarism
KW - civilising processes
KW - Elias
KW - forced feeding
KW - hunger strikes
KW - political prisoners
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85218830305
U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.13196
DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.13196
M3 - Article
C2 - 39930710
AN - SCOPUS:85218830305
SN - 0007-1315
VL - 76
SP - 578
EP - 589
JO - British Journal of Sociology
JF - British Journal of Sociology
IS - 3
ER -