TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency of delirium and subsyndromal delirium in an adult acute hospital population
AU - Meagher, David
AU - O'Regan, N.
AU - Ryan, D.
AU - Connolly, W.
AU - Boland, E.
AU - O'Caoimhe, R.
AU - Clare, J.
AU - Mcfarland, J.
AU - Tighe, S.
AU - Leonard, M.
AU - Adamis, D.
AU - Trzepacz, P. T.
AU - Timmons, S.
N1 - Royal College of Psychiatrists.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Background: The frequency of full syndromal and subsyndromal delirium is understudied. Aims: We conducted a point prevalence study in a general hospital. Method: Possible delirium identified by testing for inattention was evaluated regarding delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) using categorical (Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), DSM-IV) and dimensional (Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) scores) methods. Results: In total 162 of 311 patients (52%) screened positive for inattention. Delirium was diagnosed in 55 patients (17.7%) using DSM-IV, 52 (16.7% ) using CAM and 58 (18.6%) using DRS-R98512 with concordance for 38 (12.2%) individuals. Subsyndromal delirium was identified in 24 patients (7.7%) using a DRS-R98 score of 7-11 and 41 (13.2%) using 2/4 CAM criteria. Subsyndromal delirium with inattention (v. without) had greater disturbance of multiple delirium symptoms. Conclusions: The point prevalence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium was 25%. There was modest concordance between DRS-R98, DSM-IV and CAM delirium diagnoses. Inattention should be central to subsyndromal delirium definitions.
AB - Background: The frequency of full syndromal and subsyndromal delirium is understudied. Aims: We conducted a point prevalence study in a general hospital. Method: Possible delirium identified by testing for inattention was evaluated regarding delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) using categorical (Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), DSM-IV) and dimensional (Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) scores) methods. Results: In total 162 of 311 patients (52%) screened positive for inattention. Delirium was diagnosed in 55 patients (17.7%) using DSM-IV, 52 (16.7% ) using CAM and 58 (18.6%) using DRS-R98512 with concordance for 38 (12.2%) individuals. Subsyndromal delirium was identified in 24 patients (7.7%) using a DRS-R98 score of 7-11 and 41 (13.2%) using 2/4 CAM criteria. Subsyndromal delirium with inattention (v. without) had greater disturbance of multiple delirium symptoms. Conclusions: The point prevalence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium was 25%. There was modest concordance between DRS-R98, DSM-IV and CAM delirium diagnoses. Inattention should be central to subsyndromal delirium definitions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916618560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.139865
DO - 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.139865
M3 - Article
C2 - 25359923
AN - SCOPUS:84916618560
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 205
SP - 478
EP - 485
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -