TY - JOUR
T1 - Generality and Specificity in Stereotypes of Out-group Power and Benevolence: Views of Chechens and Jews in the Russian Federation
T2 - Views of Chechens and Jews in the Russian federation
AU - Minescu, Anca
AU - Leach, Colin Wayne
AU - Poppe, Edwin
AU - Hagendoorn, Louk
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - We examined the ascription of five characteristics (moral, peaceful, antagonistiC., smart, show initiative) to Chechens and Jews in a large, diverse, sample of participants in the Russian Federation. Factor analysis showed these five characteristics to fit within the expected two-dimensional structure of power (smart, show initiative) and benevolence (moral, peaceful, antagonistic). Consistent with historical stereotypes, Factor analysis showed power to be the more empirically important dimension regarding Jews, whereas benevolence was the more empirically important dimension regarding Chechens. Although the two-dimensional model of judgment was supported, attention to the specific characteristics that fell along these dimensions offered complementary information. For example, the ascription of high benevolence to Jews was more pronounced on the characteristics antagonistic and peaceful than on morality. In contrast, the ascription of low benevolence to Chechens was more pronounced on the characteristic peaceful than on antagonistic or moral. Together, the two general dimensions of power and benevolence, and the specific characteristics that fall along these dimensions, offer a comprehensive model of the content of out-group stereotypes.
AB - We examined the ascription of five characteristics (moral, peaceful, antagonistiC., smart, show initiative) to Chechens and Jews in a large, diverse, sample of participants in the Russian Federation. Factor analysis showed these five characteristics to fit within the expected two-dimensional structure of power (smart, show initiative) and benevolence (moral, peaceful, antagonistic). Consistent with historical stereotypes, Factor analysis showed power to be the more empirically important dimension regarding Jews, whereas benevolence was the more empirically important dimension regarding Chechens. Although the two-dimensional model of judgment was supported, attention to the specific characteristics that fell along these dimensions offered complementary information. For example, the ascription of high benevolence to Jews was more pronounced on the characteristics antagonistic and peaceful than on morality. In contrast, the ascription of low benevolence to Chechens was more pronounced on the characteristic peaceful than on antagonistic or moral. Together, the two general dimensions of power and benevolence, and the specific characteristics that fall along these dimensions, offer a comprehensive model of the content of out-group stereotypes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149134812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.577
DO - 10.1002/ejsp.577
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:57149134812
SN - 0046-2772
VL - 38
SP - 1165
EP - 1174
JO - European Journal of Social Psychology
JF - European Journal of Social Psychology
IS - 7
ER -