Good jobs – but places for women?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article is concerned with men and women's experience of elite positions and with the extent to which such positions are seen as places for women, so as to provide an insight into their commitment to continuing in them. Senior management in universities are elite positions in terms of income; those who occupy them are relatively powerful internally, although relatively powerless in relation to the state and the market. Drawing on a purposive study of those at the top three levels (i.e. presidential, vice-presidential, and dean) in public universities, it finds little difference between men and women's perceptions of the advantages/disadvantages of these positions. However, in a context where roughly four-fifths of those in university senior management are men [O'Connor, P. 2014. Management and Gender in Higher Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.], at the level of organisational narratives and at the interactional level, gender differences persist. These differences are reflected in variation in commitment to continuing in senior management positions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-319
Number of pages16
JournalGender and Education
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • advantages/disadvantages
  • elite
  • good jobs
  • interactional level
  • organisational culture
  • places
  • senior management
  • universities
  • women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Good jobs – but places for women?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this