TY - JOUR
T1 - Group membership, group change, and intergroup attitudes
T2 - A recategorization model based on cognitive consistency principles
AU - Roth, Jenny
AU - Steffens, Melanie C.
AU - Vignoles, Vivian L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Roth, Steffens and Vignoles.
PY - 2018/4/6
Y1 - 2018/4/6
N2 - The present article introduces a model based on cognitive consistency principles to predict how new identities become integrated into the self-concept, with consequences for intergroup attitudes. The model specifies four concepts (self-concept, stereotypes, identification, and group compatibility) as associative connections. The model builds on two cognitive principles, balance-congruity and imbalance-dissonance, to predict identification with social groups that people currently belong to, belonged to in the past, or newly belong to. More precisely, the model suggests that the relative strength of self-group associations (i.e., identification) depends in part on the (in)compatibility of the different social groups. Combining insights into cognitive representation of knowledge, intergroup bias, and explicit/implicit attitude change, we further derive predictions for intergroup attitudes. We suggest that intergroup attitudes alter depending on the relative associative strength between the social groups and the self, which in turn is determined by the (in)compatibility between social groups. This model unifies existing models on the integration of social identities into the self-concept by suggesting that basic cognitive mechanisms play an important role in facilitating or hindering identity integration and thus contribute to reducing or increasing intergroup bias.
AB - The present article introduces a model based on cognitive consistency principles to predict how new identities become integrated into the self-concept, with consequences for intergroup attitudes. The model specifies four concepts (self-concept, stereotypes, identification, and group compatibility) as associative connections. The model builds on two cognitive principles, balance-congruity and imbalance-dissonance, to predict identification with social groups that people currently belong to, belonged to in the past, or newly belong to. More precisely, the model suggests that the relative strength of self-group associations (i.e., identification) depends in part on the (in)compatibility of the different social groups. Combining insights into cognitive representation of knowledge, intergroup bias, and explicit/implicit attitude change, we further derive predictions for intergroup attitudes. We suggest that intergroup attitudes alter depending on the relative associative strength between the social groups and the self, which in turn is determined by the (in)compatibility between social groups. This model unifies existing models on the integration of social identities into the self-concept by suggesting that basic cognitive mechanisms play an important role in facilitating or hindering identity integration and thus contribute to reducing or increasing intergroup bias.
KW - Cognitive balance
KW - Cognitive dissonance
KW - Group change
KW - Identity integration
KW - Intergroup bias
KW - Prejudice
KW - Recategorization
KW - Social identification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045060902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045060902
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - APR
M1 - 479
ER -