How accurate are finite elements on anisotropic triangulations in the maximum norm?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In Kopteva (2014) a counterexample of an anisotropic triangulation was given on which the exact solution has a second-order error of linear interpolation, while the computed solution obtained using linear finite elements is only first-order pointwise accurate. This example was given in the context of a singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion equation. In this paper, we present further examples of unanticipated pointwise convergence behaviour of Lagrange finite elements on anisotropic triangulations. In particular, we show that linear finite elements may exhibit lower than expected orders of convergence for the Laplace equation, as well as for certain singular equations, and their accuracy depends not only on the linear interpolation error, but also on the mesh topology. Furthermore, we demonstrate that pointwise convergence rates which are worse than one might expect are also observed when higher-order finite elements are employed on anisotropic meshes. A theoretical justification will be given for some of the observed numerical phenomena.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112316
Pages (from-to)-
JournalJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Volume364
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Anisotropic diffusion
  • Anisotropic triangulation
  • Lagrange finite elements
  • Layer solutions
  • Maximum norm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How accurate are finite elements on anisotropic triangulations in the maximum norm?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this