TY - GEN
T1 - Hybrid cloud computing qos glitches
AU - Dhirani, Lubna Luxmi
AU - Newe, Thomas
AU - Nizamani, Shahzad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/9/17
Y1 - 2018/9/17
N2 - The Hybrid Cloud Computing model has been growing extensively due to its Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) architecture, customisation and cost benefits. The hybrid cloud services are measured based on the Quality of Service parameters defined by the public cloud vendors. These parameters (i.e. availability, scalability, latency etc.) vary from vendor-to-vendor, developing complexity and confusion on the grounds of methods of service assessments. A Cloud Service Level Agreement (SLA) lists the QoS provisions to be provided to the tenant, the objectives, and exclusions. Regardless of vendors promised uptimes and service metrics, the tenants are susceptible to the following threats: Data governance, Denial of Services, multi-tenancy, etc. Cloud computing has often been compared as a utility, but the basic different between a utility and the cloud is the amount of risk involved with data protection, provisioning and control. Few cloud standards have been developed for standardizing the hybrid cloud model but since each public cloud vendor provides different applications and services, these standards do not resolve the existing cloud QoS issue. Since each enterprise implementing the cloud and vendor supplying the services is diverse, a customized Trio (Cloud-IT-Business) QoS model is required to resolve the business need. The authors have designed a model to resolve this existing cloud QoS issue, the abstraction of the model is detailed in this paper.
AB - The Hybrid Cloud Computing model has been growing extensively due to its Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) architecture, customisation and cost benefits. The hybrid cloud services are measured based on the Quality of Service parameters defined by the public cloud vendors. These parameters (i.e. availability, scalability, latency etc.) vary from vendor-to-vendor, developing complexity and confusion on the grounds of methods of service assessments. A Cloud Service Level Agreement (SLA) lists the QoS provisions to be provided to the tenant, the objectives, and exclusions. Regardless of vendors promised uptimes and service metrics, the tenants are susceptible to the following threats: Data governance, Denial of Services, multi-tenancy, etc. Cloud computing has often been compared as a utility, but the basic different between a utility and the cloud is the amount of risk involved with data protection, provisioning and control. Few cloud standards have been developed for standardizing the hybrid cloud model but since each public cloud vendor provides different applications and services, these standards do not resolve the existing cloud QoS issue. Since each enterprise implementing the cloud and vendor supplying the services is diverse, a customized Trio (Cloud-IT-Business) QoS model is required to resolve the business need. The authors have designed a model to resolve this existing cloud QoS issue, the abstraction of the model is detailed in this paper.
KW - Cloud Computing Standards
KW - Cloud Fishbone.
KW - Hybrid Cloud computing
KW - Quality of Service
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055457274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IMTIC.2018.8467224
DO - 10.1109/IMTIC.2018.8467224
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85055457274
T3 - 5th International Multi-Topic ICT Conference: Technologies For Future Generations, IMTIC 2018 - Proceedings
BT - 5th International Multi-Topic ICT Conference
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 5th International Multi-Topic ICT Conference: Technologies For Future Generations, IMTIC 2018
Y2 - 25 April 2018 through 27 April 2018
ER -