Abstract
Methods to systematically document the health professionals’ perspective on relevance, cognitive impacts, use, and health outcomes of information items delivered by or retrieved in electronic knowledge resources (EKRs) may enhance evaluation of these resources, continuing education, and two-way knowledge ex change between information users and providers. The present chapter aims to overview seven years of research and development pioneering a comprehensive and systematic information assessment method (IAM), which has been validated for information delivery networks, information retrieval technology, and decision support systems. Using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies, we will support the feasibility, content validity, and construct validity of the IAM checklist combined with a computerized ecological momentary assessment technique for efficiently evaluating ‘relevance-impact-use-outcomes’ of information items derived from all these types of EKR. We will then present the current implementation of IAM 2008 for assessing e-therapeutics, an electronic textbook that provides updated therapeutic options for Canadian health professionals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Handbook of Research on Information Technology Management and Clinical Data Administration in Healthcare |
| Publisher | IGI Global |
| Pages | 521-548 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781605663579 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781605663562 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'IAM: A Comprehensive and Systematic Information Assessment Method for Electronic Knowledge Resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver