Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context on appraisal quality

Aharon Tziner, Kevin R. Murphy, Jeanette N. Cleveland, Guy Beaudin, Sylvie Marchand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The relationship between attitudes and beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context and three measures of rating quality (i.e., rating level, discrimination among ratees, discrimination among rating dimensions) were examined. Eighteen of twenty-four directional predictions about the correlations between attitudinal measures and rating behavior measures were supported. However, because of the expected weak to moderate relationships between predictors and criteria and the use of small samples, statistical power was generally low, and many of the individual observed correlations failed to reach significance. Nevertheless, the consistent pattern of support for the directional predictions suggests that the attitudes and beliefs studied here provide a useful basis for understanding performance appraisal behaviors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-467
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Business and Psychology
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of rater beliefs regarding performance appraisal and its organizational context on appraisal quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this