Abstract
This article theorises and empirically assesses some important intra-organisational implications of maximising democratic equality in political parties both between followers and members and between members and elites. They include weak member commitment, passivity of the rank-and-file membership and - depending on party structure - high levels of internal conflict. To substantiate the arguments, two parties that implement principles of democratic equality in their organisations are examined: the Swedish and German Pirate parties. These cases show, first, that while organisational structures implementing norms of equality allowed them to rapidly mobilise a considerable following, the same structures systematically reduced their capacity to consolidate support in the longer term - a weakness that might eventually put these parties' survival at risk. Second, they show that differences in the extent to which subnational units provide a foundation for member mobilisation helps to explain variation in the level of internal conflict experienced by these parties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 158-178 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Scandinavian Political Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing democratic equality in political parties: Organisational consequences in the Swedish and the German Pirate parties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver