In praise of Table 1: The importance of making better use of descriptive statistics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As data analytic methods in the managerial sciences become more sophisticated, the gap between the descriptive data typically presented in Table 1 and the analyses used to test the principal hypotheses advanced has become increasingly large. This contributes to several problems including: (1) the increasing likelihood that analyses presented in published research will be performed and/or interpreted incorrectly, (2) an increasing reliance on statistical significance as the principal criterion for evaluating results, and (3) the increasing difficulty of describing our research and explaining our findings to non-specialists. A set of simple methods for assessing whether hypotheses about interventions, moderator relationships and mediation, are plausible that are based on the simplest possible examination of descriptive statistics are proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-477
Number of pages17
JournalIndustrial and Organizational Psychology
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • descriptive statistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In praise of Table 1: The importance of making better use of descriptive statistics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this