Indirect measures of social identities: implicit association tests assess self-categorization, match–mismatch paradigms distinguish identification from disidentification

  • Christina Matschke
  • , Jenny Roth
  • , Roland Deutsch
  • , Paul Michael Heineck
  • , Jort de Vreeze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A social identity refers to (1) whether people consider a group to be an ingroup along with (2) the psychological meaning of that ingroup (Tajfel, 1978). Social identification and disidentification are two constructs that describe different natures of the psychological meaning of an ingroup. Besides self-reported measures, the Identity Implicit Association Test (identity IAT), and the Match-Mismatch Paradigm (MMP) are the most frequently used measures to assess social identity. In three studies (N = 87, N = 96, N = 137) we tested whether the MMP and identity IAT distinguish between social identification, non-identification, disidentification, and non-categorization. The findings indicate that the identity IAT mostly assesses self-categorization whereas the MMP is sensitive to the specific psychological meaning of an ingroup.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)557-591
Number of pages35
JournalSelf and Identity
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • disidentification
  • implicit identification
  • indirect measures
  • social identification
  • Social identity

Cite this