Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

  • Kuba Krys
  • , Brian W. Haas
  • , Eric Raymond Igou
  • , Aleksandra Kosiarczyk
  • , Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska
  • , Anna Kwiatkowska
  • , Vivian Miu Chi Lun
  • , Fridanna Maricchiolo
  • , Joonha Park
  • , Iva Poláčková Šolcová
  • , David Sirlopú
  • , Yukiko Uchida
  • , Christin Melanie Vauclair
  • , Vivian L. Vignoles
  • , John M. Zelenski
  • , Mladen Adamovic
  • , Charity S. Akotia
  • , Isabelle Albert
  • , Lily Appoh
  • , D. M.Arévalo Mira
  • Arno Baltin, Patrick Denoux, Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa, Carla Sofia Esteves, Vladimer Gamsakhurdia, Márta Fülöp, Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir, Alin Gavreliuc, Diana Boer, David O. Igbokwe, İdil Işık, Natalia Kascakova, Lucie Klůzová Kráčmarová, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, Olga Kostoula, Nicole Kronberger, J. Hannah Lee, Xinhui Liu, Magdalena Łużniak-Piecha, Arina Malyonova, Pablo Eduardo Barrientos, Tamara Mohorić, Oriana Mosca, Elke Murdock, Nur Fariza Mustaffa, Martin Nader, Azar Nadi, Ayu Okvitawanli, Yvette van Osch, Vassilis Pavlopoulos, Zoran Pavlović, Muhammad Rizwan, Vladyslav Romashov, Espen Røysamb, Ruta Sargautyte, Beate Schwarz, Heyla A. Selim, Ursula Serdarevich, Maria Stogianni, Chien Ru Sun, Julien Teyssier, Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg, Claudio Torres, Cai Xing, Michael Harris Bond
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • University of Georgia
  • SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Lingnan University
  • Roma Tre University
  • Nagoya University of Commerce and Business
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Universidad San Sebastián
  • Kyoto University
  • Stanford University
  • University Institute of Lisbon
  • University of Sussex
  • Carleton University
  • King's College London
  • University of Ghana
  • University of Luxembourg
  • Nord University
  • HULAB
  • Tallinn University
  • Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
  • Universidad Iberoamericana (UIA)
  • Catholic University of Portugal
  • Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
  • Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church Budapest
  • Research Centre for Natural Sciences
  • University of Iceland
  • West University of Timisoara
  • University of Koblenz
  • Baze University
  • Istanbul Bilgi University
  • Palacký University Olomouc
  • Psychiatric Clinic Pro Mente Sana
  • University of Gdańsk
  • Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • Indiana University Northwest
  • Renmin University of China
  • Omsk State University
  • University of the Valley of Guatemala
  • University of Rijeka
  • University of Cagliari
  • International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Universidad ICESI
  • Brawijaya University
  • Tilburg University
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • University of Belgrade
  • The University of Haripur
  • University of Oslo
  • Vilnius University
  • Zurich University of Applied Sciences
  • King Saud University
  • Universidad Nacional de La Matanza
  • National Chengchi University
  • University of Essex
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How can one conclude that well-being is higher in country A than country B, when well-being is being measured according to the way people in country A think about well-being? We address this issue by proposing a new culturally sensitive method to comparing societal levels of well-being. We support our reasoning with data on life satisfaction and interdependent happiness focusing on individual and family, collected mostly from students, across forty-nine countries. We demonstrate that the relative idealization of the two types of well-being varies across cultural contexts and are associated with culturally different models of selfhood. Furthermore, we show that rankings of societal well-being based on life satisfaction tend to underestimate the contribution from interdependent happiness. We introduce a new culturally sensitive method for calculating societal well-being, and examine its construct validity by testing for associations with the experience of emotions and with individualism-collectivism. This new culturally sensitive approach represents a slight, yet important improvement in measuring well-being.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)607-627
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Cultural sensitivity
  • Culture
  • Happiness
  • Interdependent happiness
  • Life satisfaction
  • Self-construals
  • Selfhoods
  • Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this