TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigation of gender bias in the mental imagery of faces
AU - Kunst, Jonas R.
AU - Juettemeier, Marilena
AU - Bailey, April H.
AU - Anjum, Gulnaz
AU - English, Alexander S.
AU - Obaidi, Milan
AU - Sam, David L.
AU - Yaşın-Tekizoğlu, Fatma
AU - Agyemang, Collins B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - People tend to think of the prototypical person as a man more than as a woman, but this bias has primarily been observed in language-based tasks. Here, we investigated whether this bias is also present in the mental imagery of faces. A preregistered cross-cultural reverse-correlation study including participants from six WEIRD and non-WEIRD countries varying in gender equality (i.e., China, Ghana, Norway, Pakistan, Turkey, and the US; N = 645) unexpectedly suggested that people imagine the face of a generic “person” more as a woman than as a man. Replicating this unexpected result, a second preregistered study (N = 115) showed that U.S. participants imagine the face of a typical person as being more similar to their imagined face of a woman than of a man. We discuss explanations for these unexpected findings, including the possibility that the prototypical person is male-biased—consistent with previous work—but the default face may be female-biased.
AB - People tend to think of the prototypical person as a man more than as a woman, but this bias has primarily been observed in language-based tasks. Here, we investigated whether this bias is also present in the mental imagery of faces. A preregistered cross-cultural reverse-correlation study including participants from six WEIRD and non-WEIRD countries varying in gender equality (i.e., China, Ghana, Norway, Pakistan, Turkey, and the US; N = 645) unexpectedly suggested that people imagine the face of a generic “person” more as a woman than as a man. Replicating this unexpected result, a second preregistered study (N = 115) showed that U.S. participants imagine the face of a typical person as being more similar to their imagined face of a woman than of a man. We discuss explanations for these unexpected findings, including the possibility that the prototypical person is male-biased—consistent with previous work—but the default face may be female-biased.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231200168
U2 - 10.1177/13684302231200168
DO - 10.1177/13684302231200168
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 1376
EP - 1402
JO - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
JF - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
IS - 6
ER -