Abstract
This paper examines teaching staff's perception of inclusive practices and UDL in one Higher Education Institution (HEI) in Ireland. This research forms part of a wider mixed-method study exploring staff and students' perceptions of inclusion as well as staff knowledge and implementation of inclusive practices, including UDL. This paper begins with a discussion around inclusive practice before exploring the development of UDL in higher education in Ireland. The data for this research were gathered through a survey administered to all teaching staff at a mid-sized Irish university, resulting in 200 responses. The survey instrument focused on staff training on inclusive practice and staff attitudes towards inclusive practices, including UDL. Findings echoed previous research regarding staff perceptions of barriers to UDL implementation, which include the time required to implement UDL and concerns about staff workload. However, findings also suggest that additional barriers to implementing UDL exist, including a lack of understanding and knowledge about UDL, as well as other institutional challenges, such as large class sizes. The findings also reveal that staff have undergone training, and many are interested in additional training, not just in UDL, but also in how to support neurodiverse students and provide formative feedback to large groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The International Journal of Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 May 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Academic Perspectives of Inclusive Practice and Universal Design for Learning (UDL)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver