TY - JOUR
T1 - Juggling with theory, evidence, practice, and real-world circumstances
T2 - Development of a complex community intervention to increase physical activity in inactive adults aged 50 years and older – The Move for Life Study
AU - García Bengoechea, Enrique
AU - Clifford, Amanda M.
AU - Gallagher, Stephen
AU - O’ Regan, Andrew
AU - O'Sullivan, Nollaig
AU - Casey, Monica
AU - Glynn, Liam
AU - Macken, Phelim
AU - Sweeney, John
AU - Donnelly, Alan
AU - Murphy, Andrew
AU - Woods, Catherine B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Despite well-known benefits of physical activity, in Ireland only 38 % of older adults are sufficiently active. Behavioural interventions are rarely developed systematically and, when reported, inadequate description often becomes a barrier for subsequent replication and scalability. In this article, we describe the development and characteristics of Move for Life, an intervention to reach and help inactive adults aged 50 years and older increase their physical activity. It was designed to fit within existing group-based structured physical activity programmes run by Local Sports Partnerships, thus maximising the likelihood of translation into policy and practice. Constructs from social cognitive theory, self-determination theory, and the conceptual model of group cohesion in exercise informed the conceptual model and the development of behavioural skills, social support, and group cohesion intervention strategies. Physical activity instructors supported by peer mentors, who also contributed to sustaining the intervention, implemented these strategies. Moving away from accounts of intervention development as a relatively simple linear process, we illustrate the complex interplay of theory, evidence, practice, and real-world contextual circumstances that shaped the development of Move for Life. Against this backdrop, we discuss issues relevant to the planning and reporting of behavioural and physical activity interventions in public health.
AB - Despite well-known benefits of physical activity, in Ireland only 38 % of older adults are sufficiently active. Behavioural interventions are rarely developed systematically and, when reported, inadequate description often becomes a barrier for subsequent replication and scalability. In this article, we describe the development and characteristics of Move for Life, an intervention to reach and help inactive adults aged 50 years and older increase their physical activity. It was designed to fit within existing group-based structured physical activity programmes run by Local Sports Partnerships, thus maximising the likelihood of translation into policy and practice. Constructs from social cognitive theory, self-determination theory, and the conceptual model of group cohesion in exercise informed the conceptual model and the development of behavioural skills, social support, and group cohesion intervention strategies. Physical activity instructors supported by peer mentors, who also contributed to sustaining the intervention, implemented these strategies. Moving away from accounts of intervention development as a relatively simple linear process, we illustrate the complex interplay of theory, evidence, practice, and real-world contextual circumstances that shaped the development of Move for Life. Against this backdrop, we discuss issues relevant to the planning and reporting of behavioural and physical activity interventions in public health.
KW - Behaviour change
KW - Community
KW - Intervention development
KW - Intervention mapping
KW - Older adults
KW - Peer mentor
KW - Physical activity
KW - Scalability
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112685700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101983
DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101983
M3 - Article
C2 - 34404011
AN - SCOPUS:85112685700
SN - 0149-7189
VL - 89
SP - -
JO - Evaluation and Program Planning
JF - Evaluation and Program Planning
M1 - 101983
ER -