Abstract
One of the purposes of Design and Technology Education (DTE) in schools has traditionally been the development of students’ technological capability. While this purpose remains valuable, I argue that there is a missed opportunity to make explicit the socio-technological leadership capacities already implicated in technological activity. Drawing on leadership theory, research in engineering education, and perspectives from the philosophy of technology, I examine how DTE is commonly framed through individualised designing and making, and how this framing can obscure the relational, value-laden, and collective dimensions of technological activities. I propose that leadership offers a lens for clarifying these dimensions, not as an additional curricular demand, but as intrinsic to technological capability understood as judgement, agency, and responsibility in contexts of uncertainty. A selective philosophical lens, drawing on Mitcham’s account of technology-as-volition alongside democratic and critical perspectives on technology, is used to argue that leadership is integral to how technological futures are imagined, negotiated, and directed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Technology and Design Education |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Leadership development
- Philosophy of technology
- Technological capability
- Technology as volition
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership development as a missed opportunity in design and technology education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver