Legislation: A Double‑Edged Sword in Union Resistance to Zero-Hours Work – The Case of Ireland

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter highlights the resilience and buoyancy of neoliberal and austerity strategies and the difficulties that unions and their allies face in challenging them. It argues that austerity in Ireland ushered in a sharp rise in zero-hours work, or fragmented and variable working time arrangements that were largely exempt from protective legislation. Even though a union strategy met with victory in the form of new legislation prohibiting zero-hours contracts, employers found other means to enforce precarious and insecure employment. Closely examining the intersection of austerity and the new regulations, the chapter finds that the new legislation has further exacerbated the precariousness of many workers in the Irish context. It also served to further undermine the Standard Employment Relationship. The chapter then contends that collective bargaining has been the more effective way to curtail precarious types of work, although many precarious workers are not unionized and hence see more benefit from a fundamental reconceptualizing of the legal taxonomy of the employment relationship to more accurately reflect its fragmented, dispersed realities.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationWorking in the Context of Austerity
    Subtitle of host publicationChallenges and Struggles
    PublisherBristol University Press
    Pages261-278
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9781529208689
    ISBN (Print)9781529208672
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Legislation: A Double‑Edged Sword in Union Resistance to Zero-Hours Work – The Case of Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this