TY - JOUR
T1 - Looped ends versus open ends braided stent
T2 - A comparison of the mechanical behaviour using analytical and numerical methods
AU - Shanahan, Camelia
AU - Tiernan, Peter
AU - Tofail, Syed A.M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - The present study has two major purposes: firstly, to investigate whether the analytical model proposed by Jedwab and Clerc for assessing the mechanical behaviour of an open ends metallic braided stent is applicable to the looped ends stent design and secondly, to compare the response of the two stent designs subjected to radial compression. We use finite element analysis to evaluate the performance of the two braided stents emulating well established designs: WALLSTENT and WallFlex. We validate the WALLSTENT model analytically. We perform a radial crimping simulation and evaluate the radial forces and stresses induced. This study confirms the validity of using the analytical model in the biomechanical analysis of the WALLSTENT design. However, in case of the WallFlex design, a major difference in the results can be observed in the levels of radial forces and wire peak stresses, justifying the decision of using a different alloy in the fabrication of the WallFlex design.
AB - The present study has two major purposes: firstly, to investigate whether the analytical model proposed by Jedwab and Clerc for assessing the mechanical behaviour of an open ends metallic braided stent is applicable to the looped ends stent design and secondly, to compare the response of the two stent designs subjected to radial compression. We use finite element analysis to evaluate the performance of the two braided stents emulating well established designs: WALLSTENT and WallFlex. We validate the WALLSTENT model analytically. We perform a radial crimping simulation and evaluate the radial forces and stresses induced. This study confirms the validity of using the analytical model in the biomechanical analysis of the WALLSTENT design. However, in case of the WallFlex design, a major difference in the results can be observed in the levels of radial forces and wire peak stresses, justifying the decision of using a different alloy in the fabrication of the WallFlex design.
KW - Braided stent
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Nitinol
KW - Phynox
KW - Self-expanding stent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028463219&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 28863400
AN - SCOPUS:85028463219
SN - 1751-6161
VL - 75
SP - 581
EP - 591
JO - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
JF - Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
ER -