TY - JOUR
T1 - Making some noise
T2 - voices of teacher educators in physical education curriculum development
AU - Murphy, Frances
AU - Parker, Melissa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Despite the potential magnitude of the influence of teacher educators on school curriculum, Ball et al. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565) argue that teacher educators are frequently excluded from curriculum design. The purpose of this study was to explore physical education teacher educators’ engagement with primary curriculum reform in Ireland; specifically to what extent a teacher education discussion forum (Network) contributed to this engagement. Data sources included: interviews with six teacher educators, meeting notes circulated following Network meetings, conversations and emails between the two researchers, and the Network’s written response to a curriculum framework circulated for consultation. Findings suggest the process of teacher educator collaboration was valuable for their professional development and provided a means to establishing an identifiable and authoritative voice in curriculum design, effective leadership was key throughout this process, and the responsibility of the Network was unequivocally to ensure that teacher educator voices were heard as policy actors in curriculum design.
AB - Despite the potential magnitude of the influence of teacher educators on school curriculum, Ball et al. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565) argue that teacher educators are frequently excluded from curriculum design. The purpose of this study was to explore physical education teacher educators’ engagement with primary curriculum reform in Ireland; specifically to what extent a teacher education discussion forum (Network) contributed to this engagement. Data sources included: interviews with six teacher educators, meeting notes circulated following Network meetings, conversations and emails between the two researchers, and the Network’s written response to a curriculum framework circulated for consultation. Findings suggest the process of teacher educator collaboration was valuable for their professional development and provided a means to establishing an identifiable and authoritative voice in curriculum design, effective leadership was key throughout this process, and the responsibility of the Network was unequivocally to ensure that teacher educator voices were heard as policy actors in curriculum design.
KW - curriculum development
KW - physical education
KW - physical education teacher educators
KW - Teacher educators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142388246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/25742981.2022.2148224
DO - 10.1080/25742981.2022.2148224
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142388246
SN - 2574-2981
VL - 14
SP - 253
EP - 270
JO - Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education
JF - Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education
IS - 3
ER -