Meritocracy, markets, social mobility: Inequality is not a crucial issue

Andrea Grisold, Henry Silke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Chapter 7 examines the subset of the corpus of newspaper articles which reacted negatively with respect to key features of Piketty’s analysis and findings. The chapter focuses on those articles which advanced defensive discourses on inequality, seeking to either downplay, deny, or conflate the key findings related to the secular trend of growing inequality. The approach and treatment in this chapter proposes that such discourses can be found in a number of categories: firstly, where the challenges focus on the method used in Piketty’s research and/or the data; secondly, where inequality is defined and treated not as a problem but rather a necessity (i.e., for innovation); and finally, discourses that oppose regulation or other intervention (such as redistribution policies) with the argument or assumption that any regulation would make matters worse.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEconomic Inequality and News Media
Subtitle of host publicationDiscourse, Power, and Redistribution
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages124-143
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780190053901
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • Economic ideology
  • Economic inequality
  • Economic news
  • Meritocracy
  • Social mobility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meritocracy, markets, social mobility: Inequality is not a crucial issue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this