TY - GEN
T1 - Motivation and autonomy in global software development
T2 - 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2017
AU - Noll, John
AU - Razzak, Mohammad Abdur
AU - Beecham, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 ACM.
PY - 2017/6/15
Y1 - 2017/6/15
N2 - Distributed development involving globally distributed teams in different countries and timezones adds additional complexity into an already complex undertaking. This paper focuses on the effect of global software development on motivation. Specifically, we ask, what impact does misalignment between needed and actual autonomy have on global team motivation? We studied members of two distributed software development teams with different degrees of distribution, both following the Scrum approach to software development. One team's members are distributed across Ireland, England and Wales; the other has members in locations across Europe and North America. We observed the teams during their Scrum "ceremonies," and interviewed each team member, during which asked we asked team members to rate their motivation on a 5 point ordinal scale. Considering both the reported motivation levels, and qualitative analysis of our observations and interviews, our results suggest that autonomy appears to be just one of three job aspects that affect motivation, the others being competence and relatedness. We hypothesize that (1) autonomy is a necessary but not sufficient condition for motivation among experienced team members, and (2) autonomy is not a motivator unless accompanied by sufficient competence.
AB - Distributed development involving globally distributed teams in different countries and timezones adds additional complexity into an already complex undertaking. This paper focuses on the effect of global software development on motivation. Specifically, we ask, what impact does misalignment between needed and actual autonomy have on global team motivation? We studied members of two distributed software development teams with different degrees of distribution, both following the Scrum approach to software development. One team's members are distributed across Ireland, England and Wales; the other has members in locations across Europe and North America. We observed the teams during their Scrum "ceremonies," and interviewed each team member, during which asked we asked team members to rate their motivation on a 5 point ordinal scale. Considering both the reported motivation levels, and qualitative analysis of our observations and interviews, our results suggest that autonomy appears to be just one of three job aspects that affect motivation, the others being competence and relatedness. We hypothesize that (1) autonomy is a necessary but not sufficient condition for motivation among experienced team members, and (2) autonomy is not a motivator unless accompanied by sufficient competence.
KW - Agile software development
KW - Autonomy
KW - Career anchors
KW - Empirical software engineering
KW - Global software development
KW - Motivation
KW - Scrum
KW - Self-determination theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025467169&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3084226.3084277
DO - 10.1145/3084226.3084277
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85025467169
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 394
EP - 402
BT - Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2017
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 15 June 2017 through 16 June 2017
ER -