TY - JOUR
T1 - Move for Life an intervention for inactive adults aged 50 years and older
T2 - a cluster randomised feasibility trial
AU - Woods, Catherine B.
AU - O’Regan, Andrew
AU - Doyle, Ciaran
AU - Hayes, Grainne
AU - Clifford, Amanda
AU - Donnelly, Alan E.
AU - Gillespie, Paddy
AU - Glynn, Liam
AU - Murphy, Andrew W.
AU - Sheikhi, Ali
AU - Bengoechea, Enrique García
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Woods, O’Regan, Doyle, Hayes, Clifford, Donnelly, Gillespie, Glynn, Murphy, Sheikhi and Bengoechea.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes. Methods: A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes. Results: Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years. Clinical trial registration: https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.
AB - Background: Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes. Methods: A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes. Results: Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years. Clinical trial registration: https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.
KW - body composition
KW - community-based
KW - energy expenditure
KW - older adults
KW - physical activity
KW - physical function
KW - well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194710971&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110
M3 - Article
C2 - 38813401
AN - SCOPUS:85194710971
SN - 2296-2565
VL - 12
SP - 1348110
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
M1 - 1348110
ER -