TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple group membership, social network size, allostatic load and well-being
T2 - A mediation analysis
AU - Stephen, Gallagher
AU - Muldoon Orla, T.
AU - Bennett Kate, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objectives: This study examined whether social network size and allostatic load (AL) mediated the association between multiple group membership (MGM) and future physical and psychological well-being. Methods: A longitudinal design was used and data from 1026 healthy participants on the relevant variables was extracted from Wave 2(2010−12), Wave 3 (2011−2013) (for baseline MGM, social network size and AL) and Wave 9 (2017–19) (for well-being at follow-up) of the Understanding Society UK population-based dataset. Results: MGM was not directly associated with future well-being, but both social network size, β = 0.06, t = 2.02, p = .04, and AL, β = −0.06, t = −2.05, p = .04, were associated with physical but not psychological well-being at follow-up. Those who had higher numbers of friends had better physical well-being, and those who had lower AL risk scores had better physical well-being at follow-up. However, MGM was indirectly associated with physical well-being through social network size, and AL such that those reporting higher MGM, reported a greater number of friends which was associated with a lower AL and then future physical well-being, β = 0.004, CI [0.001., 0.0129]. This was not evident for psychological well-being. This mediation withstood adjustment for confounding factors (e.g. age, gender, marital status lifestyle factors). Conclusion: The present study extends findings on the existing social relationships and social cure literature and our findings are discussed in relation to the social cure hypothesis.
AB - Objectives: This study examined whether social network size and allostatic load (AL) mediated the association between multiple group membership (MGM) and future physical and psychological well-being. Methods: A longitudinal design was used and data from 1026 healthy participants on the relevant variables was extracted from Wave 2(2010−12), Wave 3 (2011−2013) (for baseline MGM, social network size and AL) and Wave 9 (2017–19) (for well-being at follow-up) of the Understanding Society UK population-based dataset. Results: MGM was not directly associated with future well-being, but both social network size, β = 0.06, t = 2.02, p = .04, and AL, β = −0.06, t = −2.05, p = .04, were associated with physical but not psychological well-being at follow-up. Those who had higher numbers of friends had better physical well-being, and those who had lower AL risk scores had better physical well-being at follow-up. However, MGM was indirectly associated with physical well-being through social network size, and AL such that those reporting higher MGM, reported a greater number of friends which was associated with a lower AL and then future physical well-being, β = 0.004, CI [0.001., 0.0129]. This was not evident for psychological well-being. This mediation withstood adjustment for confounding factors (e.g. age, gender, marital status lifestyle factors). Conclusion: The present study extends findings on the existing social relationships and social cure literature and our findings are discussed in relation to the social cure hypothesis.
KW - Allostatic load
KW - Group membership
KW - Social cure
KW - Social relationships
KW - Well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116829942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110636
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110636
M3 - Article
C2 - 34638016
AN - SCOPUS:85116829942
SN - 0022-3999
VL - 151
SP - 110636
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
M1 - 110636
ER -