Abstract
This article aims to explore how ANT might help us to rethink collaborative and participatory design (C&PD) practices through converting Bruno Latour’s call for risky accounts to a call for design things together. What if ANT starts to be in the business of designing new pieces of technology and not just actor-network accounts of them? What would the design process and its outcomes look like? In response to these questions and to the challenge of co-habitation as vital condition for our technical democracy, I propose three turns in C&PDs. The first is ontological and suggests to design actor networks and to look for ways to make these networks visible. The second is methodological and suggests reimagining co-design as actor networking in public, aided by a much-needed cartography of design. The last is epistemological: it is concerned with what knowledge should inform action in the design process, and it proposes to the idea of the designer as an agnostic Prometheus.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 166-178 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | CoDesign |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2015 |
Keywords
- actor network theory
- agnosticism
- collaborative and participatory design
- democracy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Notes on ANT for designers: ontological, methodological and epistemological turn in collaborative design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver