TY - JOUR
T1 - Occupational choice of youth in a disadvantaged community
AU - Gallagher, Mary Beth
AU - Pettigrew, Judith
AU - Muldoon, Orla
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2015.
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - Introduction: The ability to make daily autonomous occupational choices has been identified as a human right and positively linked to wellbeing. Those marginalized from choice are considered at risk of occupational injustice. Disadvantaged young people are one group who may be marginalized from making such choices. Occupational choice is largely assumed to be an internal, individual process based on abilities and motivation, within environmental boundaries. From an external, contextual standpoint, this process has been scantly explored. This research, underpinned by an occupational justice perspective, sought understanding of disadvantaged young peoples' daily choices. Method: Qualitative and participative methods were used. Nine young people, aged 11-14 participated in Photovoice and photo elicitation interviews. Data were analysed thematically. Findings: Occupational choices are contextually informed and constrained, as illustrated by three themes: a limited perception of choices, choices informed by a need to stay connected to others and choices as a vehicle for social positioning. Conclusion: Occupational choices do not appear to emanate from internal interests and abilities but rather from necessitated and mandated actions based on socio-cultural expectations. This suggests that occupational therapists must pay closer attention to the social context that informs choices to improve wellbeing of at-risk young people.
AB - Introduction: The ability to make daily autonomous occupational choices has been identified as a human right and positively linked to wellbeing. Those marginalized from choice are considered at risk of occupational injustice. Disadvantaged young people are one group who may be marginalized from making such choices. Occupational choice is largely assumed to be an internal, individual process based on abilities and motivation, within environmental boundaries. From an external, contextual standpoint, this process has been scantly explored. This research, underpinned by an occupational justice perspective, sought understanding of disadvantaged young peoples' daily choices. Method: Qualitative and participative methods were used. Nine young people, aged 11-14 participated in Photovoice and photo elicitation interviews. Data were analysed thematically. Findings: Occupational choices are contextually informed and constrained, as illustrated by three themes: a limited perception of choices, choices informed by a need to stay connected to others and choices as a vehicle for social positioning. Conclusion: Occupational choices do not appear to emanate from internal interests and abilities but rather from necessitated and mandated actions based on socio-cultural expectations. This suggests that occupational therapists must pay closer attention to the social context that informs choices to improve wellbeing of at-risk young people.
KW - At-risk
KW - Occupational justice
KW - Occupational science
KW - Young people
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946054006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0308022615583065
DO - 10.1177/0308022615583065
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84946054006
SN - 0308-0226
VL - 78
SP - 622
EP - 629
JO - British Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - British Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 10
ER -