TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making
T2 - a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study
AU - Drinkwater, Jessica
AU - MacFarlane, Anne
AU - Twiddy, Maureen
AU - Meads, David
AU - Chadwick, Ruth H.
AU - Donnelly, Ailsa
AU - Gleeson, Phil
AU - Hayward, Nick
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Mir, Robina
AU - Prestwich, Graham
AU - Rathfelder, Martin
AU - Foy, Robbie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Royal College of General Practitioners. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background Health policy promotes patient participation in decision making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs that have not been systematically addressed. Aim To observe how a co-designed theory-informed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power sharing to support PPGs to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. Design and setting Participatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England was undertaken. The intervention combined two different participatory practices: partnership working involving externally facilitated meetings with PPG members and staff; and consultation with the wider patient population using a bespoke discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method To illustrate decision making in PPGs, qualitative data are presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision making. Observational data were thematically analysed using normalisation process theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group. Results In both general practices, patients influenced decision making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patient-centred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation. Conclusion Combining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.
AB - Background Health policy promotes patient participation in decision making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs that have not been systematically addressed. Aim To observe how a co-designed theory-informed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power sharing to support PPGs to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. Design and setting Participatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England was undertaken. The intervention combined two different participatory practices: partnership working involving externally facilitated meetings with PPG members and staff; and consultation with the wider patient population using a bespoke discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method To illustrate decision making in PPGs, qualitative data are presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision making. Observational data were thematically analysed using normalisation process theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group. Results In both general practices, patients influenced decision making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patient-centred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation. Conclusion Combining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.
KW - general practice
KW - participatory research
KW - patient participation
KW - primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199812851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0263
DO - 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0263
M3 - Article
C2 - 38164535
AN - SCOPUS:85199812851
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 74
SP - e552-e559
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 745
ER -