Pediatric thyroid nodules: Ultrasonographic characteristics and inter-observer variability in prediction of malignancy

Dror Koltin, Clodagh S. O'Gorman, Amanda Murphy, Bo Ngan, Alan Daneman, Oscar M. Navarro, Cristian Garcia, Eshetu G. Atenafu, Jonathan D. Wasserman, Jill Hamilton, Marianna Rachmiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pediatric thyroid nodules, while uncommon, have high malignancy risk. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify sonographic features predictive of malignancy; (2) to create a prediction model; and (3) to assess inter-observer agreement among radiologists. Methods: All available cases of thyroid nodules, surgically removed between 2000 and 2009. Three radiologists reviewed the sonographic images; 2 pathologists reviewed the tissue specimens. Adult prediction models were applied. Interobserver variability was assessed. Results: Twenty-seven subjects, mean age 13.1±3.4 years, were included. Nineteen nodules were differentiated thyroid carcinomas. On multivariate analysis, size was the only significant predictor of malignancy. On recursive partitioning analysis, size >35 mm with microcalcification and ill-defined margins yielded the best prediction model. Radiologist inter-observer agreement regarding malignancy was moderate (κ=0.50). Conclusions: Larger size, microcalcifications and ill-defined margins on ultrasound demonstrate the best predictive model for malignancy in the pediatric population. Experienced pediatric radiologists demonstrate moderate inter-observer agreement in prediction of malignancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-794
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • Inter-observer variability
  • prediction model
  • thyroid carcinoma
  • thyroid nodules
  • ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pediatric thyroid nodules: Ultrasonographic characteristics and inter-observer variability in prediction of malignancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this