Peer-supported collaborative inquiry in teacher education: exploring the influence of peer discussions on pre-service teachers’ levels of critical reflection

Oliver McGarr, Orla McCormack, Jason Comerford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scaffolding pre-service teachers to critically reflect on their practice remains a challenging goal. Exploring the extent to which peer discussion facilitates this critical reflection is the focus of this paper. Using a series of three linked tasks, pre-service teachers 1) reflected on a classroom incident from a vignette of practice, 2) shared and discussed their initial reflections with peers and 3) revisited their initial reflection in an attempt to unearth any assumptions they may have had. The study found that peer discussion broadened pre-service teachers’ perspectives beyond the initial ego-centric reflections, which were dominated by issues of pupil management, control and discipline. The peer discussion process supported pre-service teachers in identifying and questioning some of their preconceived assumptions. However, findings indicate that the process supported pre-service teachers in acquiring greater breadth rather than greater depth in reflective thinking. We would argue that rather than seeing peer engagement opportunities as a panacea, it should be viewed as a valuable scoping exercise to unearth alternative perspectives and to begin the process of ‘hunting assumptions’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-261
Number of pages17
JournalIrish Educational Studies
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • hunting assumptions
  • peer discussion
  • pre-service teacher
  • reflective practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer-supported collaborative inquiry in teacher education: exploring the influence of peer discussions on pre-service teachers’ levels of critical reflection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this