TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance analysis of different machine learning algorithms in breast cancer predictions
AU - Battineni, Gopi
AU - Chintalapudi, Nalini
AU - Amenta, Francesco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Gopi Battineni et al., licensed to EAI.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - INTRODUCTION: There is a great percentage of failures in clinical trials of early detection of breast cancer. To do this, machine learning (ML) algorithms are useful to do diagnosis and prediction of cancer tumors with better accuracy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we develop an ML model coupled with limited features to produce high classification accuracy in tumor classification. METHODS: We considered a dataset of 569 females diagnosed as 212 malignant and 357 benign types. For model development, three supervised ML algorithms namely support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) were employed. Each model was further validated by 10-fold cross-validation and performance measures were defined to evaluate the model outcomes. RESULTS: Both SVM and LR models generated 97.66% accuracy with total feature evaluation. With selective features, the SVM accuracy was improved by 98.25%. Whereas the LR model including limited features produced 100% of true positive predictions. CONCLUSION: The proposed models involved by selective features could improve the prediction accuracy of a breast cancer diagnosis.
AB - INTRODUCTION: There is a great percentage of failures in clinical trials of early detection of breast cancer. To do this, machine learning (ML) algorithms are useful to do diagnosis and prediction of cancer tumors with better accuracy. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we develop an ML model coupled with limited features to produce high classification accuracy in tumor classification. METHODS: We considered a dataset of 569 females diagnosed as 212 malignant and 357 benign types. For model development, three supervised ML algorithms namely support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) were employed. Each model was further validated by 10-fold cross-validation and performance measures were defined to evaluate the model outcomes. RESULTS: Both SVM and LR models generated 97.66% accuracy with total feature evaluation. With selective features, the SVM accuracy was improved by 98.25%. Whereas the LR model including limited features produced 100% of true positive predictions. CONCLUSION: The proposed models involved by selective features could improve the prediction accuracy of a breast cancer diagnosis.
KW - Accuracy
KW - AUC
KW - Feature selection
KW - Machine learning
KW - Tumor classification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098986831
U2 - 10.4108/eai.28-5-2020.166010
DO - 10.4108/eai.28-5-2020.166010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098986831
SN - 2411-7145
VL - 6
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology
JF - EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology
IS - 23
M1 - e4
ER -