TY - JOUR
T1 - Periapical Healing following Root Canal Treatment Using Different Endodontic Sealers
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Khandelwal, Akshay
AU - Janani, Krishnamachari
AU - Teja, Kavalipurapu Venkata
AU - Jose, Jerry
AU - Battineni, Gopi
AU - Riccitiello, Francesco
AU - Valletta, Alessandra
AU - Palanivelu, Ajitha
AU - Spagnuolo, Gianrico
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Akshay Khandelwal et al.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The healing of the periapical tissues is crucial to the success of root canal treatment. The review studies effectively examine various endodontic root canal sealants in terms of periapical healing. This systematic review was formulated following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) number-CRD42021239192. To find relevant articles, PubMed Central and Medline databases (until February 2022) were searched. Studies that evaluated healing following the application of different endodontic sealers were analysed. A primary outcome measure was the resolution of periapical lesions following the endodontic treatment. In vivo studies comparing radiographic treatment outcomes and articles with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were included. A total of 9 clinical trial studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The overall risk of bias was high in four studies out of nine studies. Periapical lesions showed significant healing after endodontic treatment regardless of sealer type, although bioceramic and bioactive sealers had shown better results.
AB - The healing of the periapical tissues is crucial to the success of root canal treatment. The review studies effectively examine various endodontic root canal sealants in terms of periapical healing. This systematic review was formulated following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) number-CRD42021239192. To find relevant articles, PubMed Central and Medline databases (until February 2022) were searched. Studies that evaluated healing following the application of different endodontic sealers were analysed. A primary outcome measure was the resolution of periapical lesions following the endodontic treatment. In vivo studies comparing radiographic treatment outcomes and articles with a minimum of 6-month follow-up were included. A total of 9 clinical trial studies that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The overall risk of bias was high in four studies out of nine studies. Periapical lesions showed significant healing after endodontic treatment regardless of sealer type, although bioceramic and bioactive sealers had shown better results.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85134720804
U2 - 10.1155/2022/3569281
DO - 10.1155/2022/3569281
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35845966
AN - SCOPUS:85134720804
SN - 2314-6133
VL - 2022
JO - BioMed Research International
JF - BioMed Research International
M1 - 3569281
ER -