Abstract
Clinicians are being urged personally to fight fat lest their credibility, health and effectiveness are threatened. Contributing to burgeoning critical weight studies, this paper extends the analysis presented in Physician Heal Thyself, Part 1 (Monaghan, 2010). Drawing from over 200 postings from an Internet site, Medscape, on the subject of 'overweight' clinicians, this paper explores three types of accountability: the excusable, the critically compliant and the justifiably resistant. Centrally, this paper critiques obesity discourse, which encircles clinicians' embodied identities, and points the way towards an approach that makes sociological and clinical sense.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 28-50 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Social Theory and Health |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Accounts
- Clinicians
- Fatness
- Obesity
- The Internet
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Physician heal thyself', Part 2: Debating clinicians bodyweight clinicians bodyweight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver