Policy advisory systems and crisis governance: the advisory committee architecture within different politicization settings

Abstract
Purpose – An Advisory Committee (AC) is a particular type of crisis governance device that provides evidence
to inform government decision-making. This article explores AC architecture and how it may determine a
government’s response capacity during the COVID-19 crisis by politicization settings (i.e. meritocratic vs
highly politicized/patronaged).
Design/methodology/approach – This study compares two cases with contrasting politicization archetypes:
Ireland as meritocratic and Slovakia as patronaged. A pattern-matching approach is applied in the case study
design.
Findings – The findings illustrate how different politicization settings impacted COVID-19 crisis governance.
The Irish case demonstrated hierarchical and traceable decision-making and AC membership was composed of
bureaucrats and independent experts focused on evidence production. The politicized Slovak case was
characterized by centralization around the prime minister, informal governance structures, circularity in
decision-making procedures and unclear accountability.
Research limitations/implications – The study provides conceptual insights that may be deployed to interpret
the impact of politicization in diverse settings.
Practical implications – The existing organizational capacity determines government response during a crisis
and strengthening AC architecture is essential. Explicit and documented governance design is critical to
accountability, transparency and societal trust.
Social implications – The design architecture of ACs can empower evidence production and contribute to
effective governance in a meritocratic setting. In contrast, a highly politicized setting may result in promoting
patronage characteristics.
Originality/value – This article contributes to emerging research on the system level arguing that the character
of the organization of expertise conditions adoption of expert ideas. It proposes a framework for comparative
analysis.