TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures
AU - Killeen, S. D.
AU - O'Sullivan, M. J.
AU - Coffey, J. C.
AU - Kirwan, W. O.
AU - Redmond, H. P.
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - Background: Oncological procedures may have better outcomes if performed by high-volume providers. Methods; A review of the English language literature incorporating searches of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane collaboration databases was performed. Studies were included if they involved a patient cohort from 1984 onwards, were community or population based, and assessed health outcome as a dependent variable and volume as an independent variable. The studies were also scored quantifiably to assess generalizability with respect to any observed volume-outcome relationship and analysed according to organ system; numbers needed to treat were estimated where possible. Results: Sixty-eight relevant studies were identified and a total of 41 were included, of which 13 were based on clinical data. All showed either an inverse relationship, of variable magnitude, between provider volume and mortality, or no volume-outcome effect. All but two clinical reports revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between volume and outcome; none demonstrated the opposite. Conclusion: High-volume providers have a significantly better outcome for complex cancer surgery, specifically for pancreatectomy, oesphagectomy, gastrectomy and rectal resection.
AB - Background: Oncological procedures may have better outcomes if performed by high-volume providers. Methods; A review of the English language literature incorporating searches of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane collaboration databases was performed. Studies were included if they involved a patient cohort from 1984 onwards, were community or population based, and assessed health outcome as a dependent variable and volume as an independent variable. The studies were also scored quantifiably to assess generalizability with respect to any observed volume-outcome relationship and analysed according to organ system; numbers needed to treat were estimated where possible. Results: Sixty-eight relevant studies were identified and a total of 41 were included, of which 13 were based on clinical data. All showed either an inverse relationship, of variable magnitude, between provider volume and mortality, or no volume-outcome effect. All but two clinical reports revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between volume and outcome; none demonstrated the opposite. Conclusion: High-volume providers have a significantly better outcome for complex cancer surgery, specifically for pancreatectomy, oesphagectomy, gastrectomy and rectal resection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144370962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bjs.4954
DO - 10.1002/bjs.4954
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15786424
AN - SCOPUS:17144370962
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 92
SP - 389
EP - 402
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -