Psychosocial vulnerability among carers of persons living with a chronic illness: A scoping review

Orlaith Cormican, Pauline Meskell, Maura Dowling

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: To outline and examine evidence related to the meaning of ‘psychosocial vulnerability’ among caregivers of persons with chronic illnesses. Background: The number of informal caregivers continues to rise globally. Their risk of psychosocial vulnerability is frequently overlooked, but understanding their psychosocial vulnerability may offer insights into meeting their needs. Design: Scoping review following the PRISMA 2020 extension guidelines. Data sources: The databases CINAHL, Embase, Medline/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Lenus and ProQuest were systematically searched to identify original research. No date limit was set, and 23 studies were included. Review methods: A five-step approach using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Thematic analysis guided data analysis. Results: Carers' psychosocial vulnerability occurs when they experience barriers to resources while access and use of supports reduce risk. Antecedents of psychosocial vulnerability include a carer's age and sex, socioeconomic status and their health and wellbeing. Psychosocial vulnerability affects carers' relationships and causes personal losses. Conclusions: The concept of carers' psychosocial vulnerability is complex. Recognition of carers at risk for psychosocial vulnerability would help nurses direct relevant support and information to carers who need it most.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13024
Pages (from-to)e13024
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Practice
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • chronic illness
  • informal carers
  • psychosocial
  • scoping review
  • vulnerability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychosocial vulnerability among carers of persons living with a chronic illness: A scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this