TY - JOUR
T1 - Put a Little Love in Your Heart: Acceptance of Paternalistic and Ally Political Discourses Both Predict Pro-Roma Solidarity Intentions Through Moral Inclusion
AU - Kende, Anna
AU - Sam Nariman, Hadi
AU - Nyúl, Boglárka
AU - Badea, Constantina
AU - Lášticová, Barbara
AU - Mahfud, Yara
AU - Gruev-Vintila, Andreea
AU - Minescu, Anca
AU - O'Connor, Ashley
AU - Boza, Mihaela
AU - Poslon, Xenia Daniela
AU - Popper, Miroslav
AU - Hadarics, Márton
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Political Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society of Political Psychology.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - The way politicians talk about minorities institutes the normative context of intergroup relations. We investigated how endorsement of different political discourses predicts donation and collective action intentions by majority members toward the Roma in five European countries. The survey was conducted online using samples demographically similar to the populations of Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, France, and Ireland (N = 5,054). First, results showed that accepting paternalistic discourse versus discourse promoting allyship were not distinguishable; both promoted higher moral inclusion which in turn predicted higher prosocial intentions. Second, donations (i.e., immediate relief) and collective action (i.e., social change action) were driven by identical factors. Third, acceptance of openly hostile political discourse neither predicted moral exclusion, nor lower prosocial intentions. In summary, our research provides important evidence that when it comes to Roma—non-Roma relations, the previously established distinction between solidarity intentions that aim to solidify status relations versus bring about social change is completely blurred, presumably because of the social context in which any positive message communicates moral inclusion challenging the hostile status quo.
AB - The way politicians talk about minorities institutes the normative context of intergroup relations. We investigated how endorsement of different political discourses predicts donation and collective action intentions by majority members toward the Roma in five European countries. The survey was conducted online using samples demographically similar to the populations of Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, France, and Ireland (N = 5,054). First, results showed that accepting paternalistic discourse versus discourse promoting allyship were not distinguishable; both promoted higher moral inclusion which in turn predicted higher prosocial intentions. Second, donations (i.e., immediate relief) and collective action (i.e., social change action) were driven by identical factors. Third, acceptance of openly hostile political discourse neither predicted moral exclusion, nor lower prosocial intentions. In summary, our research provides important evidence that when it comes to Roma—non-Roma relations, the previously established distinction between solidarity intentions that aim to solidify status relations versus bring about social change is completely blurred, presumably because of the social context in which any positive message communicates moral inclusion challenging the hostile status quo.
KW - anti-Gypsyism
KW - collective action
KW - donations
KW - moral inclusion
KW - political discourse
KW - Roma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145209397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pops.12877
DO - 10.1111/pops.12877
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145209397
SN - 0162-895X
VL - 44
SP - 1077
EP - 1095
JO - Political Psychology
JF - Political Psychology
IS - 5
ER -