Raters Who Pursue Different Goals Give Different Ratings

Kevin R. Murphy, Jeanette N. Cleveland, Amie L. Skattebo, Ted B. Kinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

J. N. Cleveland and K. R. Murphy (1992) suggested that phenomena such as rater errors and interrater disagreements could be understood in terms of differences in the goals pursued by various raters. We measured 19 rating goals of students at the beginning of a semester, grouped them into scales, and correlated these with teacher evaluations collected at the end of the semester. We found significant multiple correlations, both within classes and in an analysis of the pooled sample (adjusting for instructor mean differences, incremental R 2 = .08). Measures of rating goals obtained after raters had observed a significant proportion of ratee performance accounted for variance (incremental R 2 = .07) not accounted for by measures of goals obtained at the beginning of the semester.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-164
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Cite this